1 d

As they gain popularity, more people a?

Assuming a market weight equity portfolio, if you hold ?

That is to say less about absolutely maximizing returns and more about spreading my risk while still earning a … I am looking to replicate a 60/40 portfolio of VTI+VXUS (or basically VT) in my taxable account with ETFs at the asset class level to allow for more regular tax loss harvesting We have 10 different investment accounts, so I was planning on doing VTI+VXUS in my retirement accounts and this other approach in our one taxable account The 2 fund approach with VTI + VXUS with a 60/40 ratio is my other option since VT is not a fund-of-funds, so I would not get the FTC for international Any updated thoughts on the long-term tax efficiency of AVGE vs retiredjg Posts: 56089 Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:56 pm. VT has slightly more qualified dividends compared to VTI. Oh, … A quick look at the portfolio holdings shows that VT holds all of VXUS, but of the VTI's 3606 stocks it holds only around half of the US stocks. Portfolio 2 is the total US stock market, equivalent to VTI. auntjudysxxx This choice might be more nuanced if VEU were cheaper than VXUS, but they cost the same 0 VT vs VTI+VXUS. For some people, that’s too much international exposure and they’d prefer to control international exposure themselves by allocating to VTI and VXUS separately. In a hurry? Here are the highlights: VT and VTI are two … VTI and VXUS are both exchange traded funds; Both require a minimum investment equal to the price of one share; The funds have the following differences: VXUS has a slightly higher expense ratio (03%) … Compare VT and VXUS based on historical performance, risk, expense ratio, dividends, Sharpe ratio, and other vital indicators to decide which may better fit your portfolio. The benefit of FTC in holding VTI + VXUS is a wash compared to VT. But it is one potential reason to prefer VXUS/VTI over VT. darius gaskin net worth That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Regular maintenance and servicing are crucial to ensure the longevi. ) VT does not use a fixed 40%, it follows global market cap weights. It's almost no extra effort over VT, but on top of the tax-loss harvesting mentioned by u/lonesomewhistle, VT has an expense ratio of 0. michelle alter leaked I would think for simplicity the latter would be the more common choice. ….

Post Opinion